www.MarcusBall.com

Home Contact Massage Therapy Customer Care Telecomunications
 
Home ] Past Employment ] Personal History ] Massage School Notes ] Cooking ] Psychology ] Reference Library ] Site Map ]
SOLO ...
Past Employment
Personal History
Massage School Notes
Cooking
Psychology
Reference Library
Site Map

 Contents
References


Up

Dr,John Stephens
Child Development Theories
Erikson's Stages of Development
Freuds Stages of Development
Jean Piaget
Piagets Theory of Development
Anticipatory-Avoidance
Cognitive Theory
Assimilation & Accommodation
Authority & learning
Behaviorism
Behavior Modification
Bloom’s Taxonomy
Cognitive Theories
Constructivist Theory
2 Different Learning Styles
Critical Reflection
Cultural Considerations
Approaches to Study
Cognitive Dissonance
Experiential Learning
History of Behaviorism
Gestalt
Imitation
Learning Index
“Intelligence”
Knowles’ Andragogy
Learned Helplessness
Learning how to Learn
Learning & Teaching System
The Learning Curve
Memory
Motivation & Anxiety
Motivation to Learn
Multiple Intelligences
Systems & Conversation
Personal Constructs
Piaget
References
Reflective Practice
Resistance to Learning
Legitimate Peripheral Participation
SOLO
Tacit knowledge
Theories of Learning
So what is Learning?

Past Employment

Massage Therapy Clinical Therapist
Telecom Products Sales Executive
ASP Support Client Services
Inquiry Center CRM Specialist
Call Center Design Engineer
Help Desk Desktop Support
Call Center Client Communications Hospitality Reservations Manager
Sales Special Orders
Retail Commercial Ast Manager

Or Read:
Resume
Customer Centricity
Ethics

 SOLO

The SOLO taxonomy stands for:

      Structure of
      Observed
      Learning
      Outcomes

It was developed by Biggs and Collis (1982), and is well described in Biggs (1999)

It describes level of increasing complexity in a student's understanding of a subject, through five stages, and it is claimed to be applicable to any subject area. Not all students get through all five stages, of course, and indeed not all teaching (and even less "training" is designed to take them all the way).

There are fairly clear links not only with Säljö on conceptions of learning, but also, in the emphasis on making connections and contextualising, with Bateson's levels of learning, and even with Bloom's taxonomy in the cognitive domain. Like my pyramidal representation of Bloom, the assumption is that each level embraces previous levels, but adds something more:

1 Pre-structural: here students are simply acquiring bits of unconnected information, which have no organisation and make no sense.
 

 

 

2 Unistructural: simple and obvious connections are made, but their significance is not grasped.

3 Multistructural: a number of connections may be made, but the meta-connections between them are missed, as is their significance for the whole.

 

4 Relational level: the student is now able to appreciate the significance of the parts in relation to the whole.

5 At the extended abstract level, the student is making connections not only within the given subject area, but also beyond it, able to generalize and transfer the principles and ideas underlying the specific instance.

 

I confess to a slight distrust of this kind of "progressive" model, which aspires inexorably to a final state. I am not convinced that every subject area fits the model, but nevertheless it is quite a good guide, and gives some idea of the place of the Gestalt insight (at the fourth, relational level). What it does not deal with is the student who establishes a relational construct which is nevertheless wrong, and those who pursue wild geese at the extended abstract level because they are insufficiently informed at more modest levels. See Umberto Eco's "Foucault's Pendulum".

Original content updated and hosted at www.learningandteaching.info/learning/

Home ] Contact ] Massage Therapy ] Customer Care ] Telecomunications ]